North-facing used to be the only answer for solar in Perth. Today, with time-based export rates and evening peaks, west-facing and split arrays deserve a serious look. Using modelled data for Perth, this guide compares orientations and tilt angles so you can see exactly what each choice costs or gains.

Orientation and tilt basics
Orientation (or azimuth) is the compass direction the panels face. Tilt is the angle of the panels from horizontal, which on most homes is simply the roof pitch. In the southern hemisphere, panels facing true north see the sun for the longest part of the day, which is why north is the default recommendation.
CSIRO notes that, based on solar geometry alone, annual output is maximised when panels face the equator and are tilted at an angle equal to the local latitude. Perth sits at about 32° south, so the textbook answer is north at roughly 32°. In practice, most Perth roofs are pitched lower than that, and the textbook answer ignores something that now matters a great deal: when the energy is produced.
Maximum kilowatt-hours per year is not the same as maximum dollars per year. The value of each kWh depends on whether you use it at home, export it at midday or export it in the evening peak.
Perth solar output by direction: the data
We modelled a 1 kW system in Perth using the European Commission’s free PVGIS tool (ERA5 climate data, 14% system losses). The results below are per kW of panels, so multiply by your system size. A 6.6 kW array facing north at 20°, for example, would produce roughly 6.6 x 1,695 = about 11,200 kWh a year under these assumptions.
| Direction | 10° tilt | 20° tilt | 32° tilt | vs north at same tilt (20°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 1,635 | 1,695 | 1,714 | 100% |
| North-west | 1,603 | 1,640 | 1,639 | 97% |
| North-east | 1,603 | 1,640 | 1,641 | 97% |
| West | 1,521 | 1,490 | 1,430 | 88% |
| East | 1,522 | 1,492 | 1,434 | 88% |
| South | 1,392 | 1,217 | 988 | 72% |
Three takeaways stand out. North-west and north-east cost only about 3% compared with true north. West and east cost about 12% at a typical 20° pitch, and the penalty shrinks on flatter roofs (about 7% at 10°). South-facing panels lose the most, especially on steep roofs, although on a near-flat roof even south can still be workable.
These numbers line up with CSIRO’s national analysis, which found that pointing panels up to 45° away from the ideal direction loses only a small percentage of yearly energy in Australian capital cities, while 90° away loses more, ranging from about 9% in Darwin to about 26% in Melbourne.

How much does tilt matter?
Less than most people expect. CSIRO’s analysis of PVWatts data found that a tilt angle 20° away from optimum reduces annual yield by only around 5%, and 30° away by around 12%. For a north-facing array in Perth, our modelling shows 1,635 kWh per kW at 10° versus 1,714 at 32°, a gap of under 5%.
| Tilt (north-facing) | Summer month (Dec) | Winter month (Jun) | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10° | 193 | 78 | 1,635 |
| 20° | 185 | 92 | 1,695 |
| 32° | 170 | 104 | 1,714 |
Steeper panels produce more in winter, when the sun is low, and less in summer. Flatter panels do the opposite. Tilt frames can raise a flat array to a better angle, but CSIRO points out that the small gain may not justify the added cost and visual impact. Flat panels also self-clean less effectively in rain, so very low angles below about 5° are best avoided.
The case for west-facing panels in Perth
Here is where the story changes. Using hourly PVGIS data, we looked at how much of each array’s output arrives between 3pm and 9pm, which matches Synergy’s DEBS peak export window and the time most households start cooking, cooling and running appliances.
| Direction (20° tilt) | Annual output per kW | Output 3pm – 9pm per kW | Share in 3pm – 9pm |
|---|---|---|---|
| North | 1,672 kWh | 251 kWh | 15% |
| North-west | 1,617 kWh | 356 kWh | 22% |
| West | 1,472 kWh | 384 kWh | 26% |
| East | 1,478 kWh | 104 kWh | 7% |
A west-facing array produces about 12% less energy across the year, but roughly 50% more during the 3pm – 9pm window than a north-facing array. If that late-afternoon output replaces grid power you would otherwise buy, or earns the DEBS peak rate rather than the midday rate, the lower total can still be worth more. Synergy itself encourages new customers to talk to their installer about west-facing panels for exactly this reason.
If someone is home in the afternoon, you run air conditioning on hot summer evenings, or you export a lot, west or north-west panels often deliver better value per kWh. If the house is empty all day and you have a battery to soak up surplus, north usually maximises total energy.
This timing effect is closely tied to the duck curve in WA’s grid, where midday demand collapses because of rooftop solar and then rises steeply as the sun sets.
Split arrays and east-west roofs
Many Perth homes have hip roofs with faces in several directions. Splitting panels across north and west, or east and west, spreads production over a longer part of the day. An east-west array has a lower peak but a flatter, wider output curve, which suits households that use power in both the morning and late afternoon.
Split arrays need the right equipment. Each roof face should go on its own string with its own MPPT (maximum power point tracker) input, or use microinverters or optimisers, so a shaded or differently oriented face does not drag down the rest. Ask your installer to show you the string layout on the design.

How to choose the right orientation for your home
- Map your usage. Use your Synergy bill or smart meter data to see when you use the most power.
- Check shading first. A well-oriented roof face that is shaded in the afternoon may underperform a less ideal but clear face.
- Use your largest unshaded faces. Panel count usually matters more than a few percent of orientation loss.
- Factor in a battery. If you plan to add a solar battery, north can maximise the energy available to charge it.
- Run the numbers. Compare payback for each layout using real system pricing. Our guide to the price of a solar panel system in Perth and our 6.6 kW ROI breakdown are good starting points.
New WA connection requirements for systems installed from 1 May 2026 include remote management capability or a fixed export limit. If your exports are capped, self-consumption becomes even more important, which can favour orientations that match your usage.
Frequently asked questions
Is north always best for solar in Perth?
North produces the most energy over a year, but not always the most value. West and north-west arrays produce more in the afternoon and evening, which can match household use and the DEBS peak export rate better.
How much do I lose with west-facing panels?
Modelled PVGIS data for Perth shows about 12% less annual output for west versus north at a 20° pitch, and about 7% less at 10°.
Do I need tilt frames on a flat roof?
Not usually. A 10° north-facing array produces only about 5% less than the ideal 32° in Perth. Frames add cost and wind load, so they make sense mainly on very flat roofs where self-cleaning is a concern.
Can I put panels on east and west roofs together?
Yes. East-west arrays give a wider, flatter output curve. Each face should be on a separate MPPT input or use module-level electronics.
Is a south-facing roof worth using?
On steep roofs south faces lose a lot of output. On low-pitched roofs the loss is smaller, so south can still be worthwhile if other faces are full or shaded.
Not sure which roof face to use?
Future Solar WA designs every system around your roof, shading and usage pattern. Get a tailored layout and quote.
Get a free solar quote- European Commission JRC – PVGIS v5.2 photovoltaic performance tool (ERA5 database) – https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/
- CSIRO – Solar photovoltaics: optimising performance – https://research.csiro.au/infratech/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2024/12/4393_SolarPhotovoltaicsoptimisingperformance_WCAG.pdf
- Synergy – Distributed Energy Buyback Scheme (DEBS) – https://www.synergy.net.au/Your-home/Manage-account/Solar-connections-and-upgrades/Distributed-Energy-Buyback-Scheme
- Energy Policy WA – New requirements for small-scale solar and battery systems – https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/energy-policy-wa/new-requirements-small-scale-solar-and-battery-systems
- energy.gov.au – Solar system design considerations – https://www.energy.gov.au/solar/solar-system-design/design-considerations